Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
От | Mario Weilguni |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 493E61E1.1020303@sime.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives? (Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alan Hodgson schrieb: >>>>> Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote: >>>>> >>> strange values. An individual drive is capable of delivering 91 >>> MB/sec >>> >>> sequential read performance, and we get values ~102MB/sec out of a >>> 8-drive RAID5, seems to be ridiculous slow. >>> > > > What command are you using to test the reads? > > Some recommendations to try: > > 1) /sbin/blockdev --setra 2048 device (where device is the partition or LVM > volume) > > 2) Use XFS, and make sure your stripe settings match the RAID. > > Having said that, 102MB/sec sounds really low for any modern controller with > 8 drives, regardless of tuning or filesystem choice. > > First, thanks alot for this and all the other answers. I measured the raw device performance: dd if=/dev/cciss/c0d0 bs=64k count=100000 of=/dev/null I get poor performance when all 8 drives are configured as one, large RAID-5, and slightly poorer performance when configured as JBOD. In production, we use XFS as FS, but I doubt this has anything to do with FS tuning.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: