Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4938F795.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Incidentally this timing is with the 75kB toasted arrays in shared buffers > because the table has just been analyzed. If it was on a busy system then > just > planning the query could involve 75kB of I/O which is what I believe was > happening to me way back when I last observed super-long plan times. I'm pretty sure I saw that in some of my tests with larger targets. With a large database and a large target, some of the tables' statistics apparently weren't still cached the first time I planned the query, and I got an extremely long plan time on the first attempt, and then it settled in within a pretty narrow range on repeated plans. I discarded the initial plan time as immaterial for our purposes because a query that's run 300,000 times per day is probably going to keep its statistics in cache most of the time. I was looking at trying to modify the perl script from Robert Haas to run my query at a wide range of target values, collecting analyze and plan times at each. Now that you have an easy-to-create synthetic example, is this still worth it, considering that it would be on 8.2? (If we wait a week or two, I could probably do it on 8.3.) We do have gprof on these systems, although I'd need advice on how to use it. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: