Re: PiTR and other architectures....

>
> But, as Simon pointed out, is it really worth the risk? PITR is closer
> to a physical process, and it's probably wise to just assume it's not
> portable.
>   

Yeah...I am getting that impression ;-). From this I will assume we need:
- same OS (and OS minor version?)- same CPU architecture

I was hoping it was a simple set of requirements, but that's life.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 03 5330 3171          |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
http://www.rhyme.com.au <http://www.rhyme.com.au/>         
|                /           \|                                |    --________--
GPG key available upon request.  |  /                                |/