Re: PiTR and other architectures....
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PiTR and other architectures.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4935C183.6050104@rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PiTR and other architectures.... (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PiTR and other architectures....
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:21 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> initdb on one platform, copy the data directory over to the other >> system, and try to start postmaster. It will complain if the on-disk >> format is not compatible. >> >> You can also run pg_controlinfo on both systems, and compare the >> results. If the "Maximum data alignment", and all the values below it in >> the pg_controlinfo output match, the formats are compatible. >> > > I don't think these things will work for all differences that could be > problematic. For instance, a GNU system has a different collation for > the en_US locale than an OS X system. This means that the indexes built > using en_US on one system can't be moved to the other. > > How would either of these tests be able to determine that the systems > are incompatible? > > wow...that's a little scary. Sounds like there is no trustworthy test I can run. Other than the case of collation differences, are there any other kinds of problems that would not be detected by even a postmaster restart? |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: