Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
От | James B. Byrne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49354.216.185.71.25.1291760145.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, December 7, 2010 16:56, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > No those lib differences are both still 32bit. You would have a > problem if one was 64bit. So you should be fine there. > > Joshua D. Drake > Ok. How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on startup? The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to me. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: