Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5
| От | Matt Magoffin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49338.192.168.1.106.1234211136.squirrel@msqr.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5
Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> * Matt Magoffin (postgresql.org@msqr.us) wrote: >> [root@170226-db7 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo >> CommitLimit: 10312588 kB >> Committed_AS: 9760756 kB > > I suspect this may be it... Apparently, while you're only using about > 2G, you've got 10G or so of outstanding commitments, and Linux is > refusing to allocate more. > > You probably want to up your overcommit_ratio, esp. in light of the fact > that you've only got 2G of swap on this box. I'd probably say up it to > 80, which would give you 14.8G of commitable memory, leaving some room > in-memory (1.2G) for cache/buffers and whatnot. Alternativly, you could > go for 90, which would allow commits up to 16.4G, so if everyone used > all their memory, you'd be into swap. Thanks for the advice. Should we have more than 2GB of swap available? I thought the goal for a Postgres system was to avoid swap use at all cost? Would it be better for us to add more swap, or adjust this overcommit_ratio as you discuss? Regards, Matt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: