Re: max_fsm_relations
От | Adam Radłowski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_fsm_relations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4932EEF9.60603@informatyka.gdansk.pl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_fsm_relations (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_fsm_relations
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
So, are You suggesting, that at the time of full database vacuuming, some of tables are not vacuumed, when "max_fsm_relations" is to small ? Thanks for Your fast answer. Adam Tom Lane pisze: > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Adam_Rad=B3owski?= <adamr@informatyka.gdansk.pl> writes: >> PostgreSQL 8.1.3 (windows), 8.1.9 - 8.1.10 (linux). >> I have databases, what are vacuumed using cron very regularry (vacuumdb >> -a -f ...) and I know when should do this. Automatic vacuuming is off. >> There are thousands of tables in one cluster (for ex. 10000). If I do >> vacuuming manually, I can see the warning: >> NOTICE: max_fsm_relations(1000) equals the number of relations checked >> HINT: You have at least 1000 relations. Consider increasing the >> configuration parameter "max_fsm_relations". >> But all is working properly. > > Only for small values of "properly". You will be seeing table bloat > over time if you don't make the FSM large enough. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: