Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> There is another problem, though, if the map is frequently probed for 
>> pages that don't exist in the map, or the map doesn't exist at all. 
>> Currently, the size of the map file is kept in relcache, in the 
>> rd_vm_nblocks_cache variable. Whenever a page is accessed that's > 
>> rd_vm_nblocks_cache, smgrnblocks is called to see if the page exists, 
>> and rd_vm_nblocks_cache is updated. That means that every probe to a 
>> non-existing page causes an lseek(), which isn't free.
> 
> Well, considering how seldom new pages will be added to the visibility
> map, it seems to me we could afford to send out a relcache inval event
> when that happens.  Then rd_vm_nblocks_cache could be treated as
> trustworthy.

Here's an updated version, with a lot of smaller cleanups, and using 
relcache invalidation to notify other backends when the visibility map 
fork is extended. I already committed the change to FSM to do the same. 
I'm feeling quite satisfied to commit this patch early next week.

I modified the VACUUM VERBOSE output slightly, to print the number of 
pages scanned. The added part emphasized below:

postgres=# vacuum verbose foo;
INFO:  vacuuming "public.foo"
INFO:  "foo": removed 230 row versions in 10 pages
INFO:  "foo": found 230 removable, 10 nonremovable row versions in *10 
out of* 43 pages
DETAIL:  0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 0 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.
CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
VACUUM

That seems OK to me, but maybe others have an opinion on that?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com