Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules
От | Bernd Helmle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49290.62.152.162.10.1230584023.squirrel@tooney.at.xencon.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Bernd Helmle <bernd@oopsware.de> wrote: > > i would say check for negative attnums and deny that view to be > updateable because of SQL92 says in 11.19 <view definition> syntax > rule 6: > """ > 6) If the <query expression> is updatable, then the viewed table > is > an updatable table. Otherwise, it is a read-only table. > """ > wich i understand as deny updatability in any view that constains non > updateable <query expression> in the target list > Yes, but afaiks SQL99 allows partial updatable column lists, so we could argue that we can follow this. However, it seems your approach is better for now. > > yes. if we didn't do that we will be against spec. syntax rule 12 > (again in 11.19 <view definition> ) says: > """ > 12)If WITH CHECK OPTION is specified, then the viewed table shall > be updatable. > > """ Okay. I'm currently travelling (visiting my parents during turn of the year), checking my mail sporadically. I'll provide an updated patch ASAP. Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: