Re: TABLE command
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TABLE command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4922CAD6.4000805@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TABLE command (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TABLE command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm. Given the current infrastructure for \h, the only way to do that > would be to make a separate ref page for WITH, which feels like the > wrong thing. And the objection I have to TABLE is not the code but the > apparent need to give it its own ref page (as we already did for VALUES, > and I found that pretty ugly too). > > Is there a way to make all of these point at the SELECT ref page? I was looking into that and I figured using the \G expression in Perl REs would be useful for this (to find multiple <refname>s). But this was introduced in Perl 5.000, and we claim to support Perl 4 in create_help.pl. I recall that you Tom once arranged this to support building on some old machines. Is this still relevant? Or can someone advise on an alternative way to code this?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: