Re: Change in logging behaviour between 8.1 and 8.2
От | Ben Webber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change in logging behaviour between 8.1 and 8.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49218E6C.1060201@egsgroup.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Change in logging behaviour between 8.1 and 8.2 (Ben Webber <ben.webber@egsgroup.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Arrrghhh, it was was actually 10 (not that it really makes any difference), should have actually waited for file to unzip before posting!!! Ben Webber wrote: > Sorry, meant 2 gigs, not 10. > > An interesting suggestion, but the problem with storing the logfiles in > a table for us would be that uncompressed, the log file for a day is > about 10 gigs. This would mean that an unacceptable amount of excess > data would accumulate in the database. It would be feasible however to > write a script to import the archived logfile into a new temporary > database on a different server, then use SQL to search it and delete the > db when finished. > > Thanks for the suggestion though. > > Ben. > > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Ben Webber wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wrote a shell script to find the duration and the related statement >>> in the log file and place them one after the other if the duration is >>> over a specified time like this:- >>> >>> 2008-10-31 02:00:49 GMT [23683] [mp_live] LOG: statement: CLUSTER; >>> 2008-10-31 02:04:42 GMT [23683] [mp_live] LOG: duration: 232783.684 ms >> >> I wonder if you'd benefit from doing CSV logs and then storing them into >> a table. Querying using SQL is probably going to be easier (and more >> robust -- it'd work even with embedded newlines etc). >> > > > > This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. > www.surfcontrol.com >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: