Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 491dba16-55df-d5fd-1ae7-01b5140987f0@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/6/22 04:09, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:25:51AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 09:36:13AM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote: >>> Good catch, I think this is a logical followup to the previous >>> has_privs_of_role patch. >>> >>> Reviewed and +1 >> >> Thanks! I created a commitfest entry for this: > > This patch looks simple, but it is a very sensitive area so I think > that we should be really careful. pg_hba.conf does not have a lot of > test coverage, so I'd really prefer if we add something to see the > difference of behavior and check the behavior that we are switching > here. Agreed > Joe, you are registered as a reviewer and committer of this patch, by > the way. Are you planning to look at it? I am meaning to get to it, but as you say wanted to spend some time to understand the nuances and life keeps getting in the way. I will try to prioritize it over the next week. Joe -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: