Re: libpq-events windows gotcha
От | Andrew Chernow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq-events windows gotcha |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 491B0DB7.6020101@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq-events windows gotcha (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq-events windows gotcha
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes: >> Just noticed that the last libpqtypes release was broken on windows when >> dynamically linking. The problem is that windows has two addresses for >> functions, the import library uses a stub "ordinal" address while the >> DLL itself is using the real address; yet another m$ annoyance. This >> breaks the PQEventProc being used as a unique lookup value. >> This is a big gotcha for any libpq-events implementors. It should >> probably be documented in some fashion. > > Hmm. Well, it's not too late to reconsider the use of the function > address as a lookup key ... but what else would we use instead? > > regards, tom lane > > Here are the options we see: 1. PQregisterEventProc returns a handle, synchronized counter incremented by libpq. A small table could map handle value to proc address, so register always returns the same handle for a provided eventproc. Only register would take an eventproc, instanceData functions would take this magical handle. 2. string key, has collision issues (already been ruled out) 3. have implementors return a static variable address (doesn't seem all that different from returning a static funcaddr) 4. what we do now, but document loudly that PGEventProc must be static. If it can't be referenced outside the DLL directlythen the issue can't arise. If you need the function address for calls to PQinstanceData, an implementor can create a public function that returns their private PGEventProc address. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: