Re: TABLE command

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Incidentally, I noticed while looking at this that "\h with" also
>> fails, even though WITH can now be the first word of a valid SQL
>> statement.  I think we ought to patch psql to return the same help for
>> WITH as it does for SELECT.
> 
> Hmm.  Given the current infrastructure for \h, the only way to do that
> would be to make a separate ref page for WITH, which feels like the
> wrong thing.

There is a canonical solution for this with man pages, namely man page 
links (those ".so" things in a man page that redirect to a different 
one).  In DocBook, you just list more than one refname in the refentry 
to create this.  I have committed a few bits of makefile to support 
this.  A bit more Perl hacking should also get psql up to speed.  I 
suggest we try if we like the results when WITH is linked to SELECT, and 
then see about TABLE and whatever else.