Yes this worked in previous versions.
As you close the cursor say '<unnamed portal 1>' when you fetch it, it closes the underlying cursor. And the send variable also points to the same variable, and you send a FETCH ALL..... which throws exception because cursor has already been closed.
--Altaf
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
Did this work in previous versions ?
I made a change recently which closes the refcursor immediately after reading it, because it was leaking on large batches
Dave
On 27-Apr-07, at 8:20 AM, Altaf Malik wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a bug with refcursors with the latest JDBC driver. I cannot get two refcursors as OUT parameter if both of them point to the same underlying refcursor.
Steps to produce:
1- Create table:
CREATE TABLE testref ( a int4, b varchar);
2-Create the function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION reftwo(
A OUT REFCURSOR, B OUT REFCURSOR)
RETURNS record AS $$ DECLARE
V_REF REFCURSOR;
BEGIN
OPEN V_REF FOR SELECT * FROM testref;
A:=V_REF;
B:=V_REF;
END; $$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
3- Run the following code:
con.setAutoCommit(false);
CallableStatement stm = con.prepareCall("{call reftwo(?,?)}");
stm.registerOutParameter(1,Types.OTHER);
stm.registerOutParameter(2,Types.OTHER);
stm.execute();
ResultSet rs = (ResultSet) stm.getObject(1);
ResultSet rs2 = (ResultSet) stm.getObject(2);
con.setAutoCommit(true);
When i execute this code, it reports the following problem:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: cursor "<unnamed portal 1>" does not exist
Am i doing something wrong?
--Altaf Malik
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out
new cars at Yahoo! Autos.