Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in pg_config
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in pg_config |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48f9b357-566f-25a1-db60-5bcbe52afdfb@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in pg_config (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in pg_config
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/14/18 3:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumwgTWFyw61uIFJvZHLDrWd1ZXo=?= <rmrodriguez@carto.com> writes: >> I've been trying to run Postgis regress tests under Clang sanitizers and one of >> the issues I'm facing is the constant stream of errors during the `configure` >> step coming from calls to `pg_config`. > > TBH, I do not think we should do anything about this. It has never been > project policy that short-lived programs should free everything before > exiting, and I don't think we should change that. initdb, in particular, > would need a huge amount of work to meet such a policy, and it would > really be entirely wasted effort. Just because you've configured your > tools to enforce an unreasonable policy doesn't make it a reasonable one. > Yeah. Incidentally we had the same discussion about initdb a few days ago [1], and the conclusion was pretty much exactly the same. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3fe1e38a-fb70-6260-9300-ce67ede21c32%40redhat.com regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: