Re: minimal update
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: minimal update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48FDE31D.5040200@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: minimal update (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: minimal update
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > >> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it >> easily? >> > > One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when > to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the > documentation. There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger" > would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document > itself pretty much however it wants. > I was thinking a new section on 'trigger functions' of the functions and operators chapter, linked from the 'create trigger' page. That doesn't seem like too much of a wart. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: