Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48FCDB04.2080008@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy ("Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada wrote: > The real problem is not how to cut off preceding rows, but how to read > ahead after the current row. I intend to avoid reading ahead until end > of the partition for only row_number() that doesn't need any following > rows. Sometimes we have to store whole the partition before returning > the first result and sometimes not. It depends on function categories, > or function access range. My current idea is classify Window function > API to three parallel to buffering strategies. Could the rows be read ahead on demand? If the window function calls window_getarg on a row that's not yet fetched, fetch forward to that row. > And the lag()/lead(), spec says "OFFSET is exact numeric literal" but > we postgres doesn't have mechanism to limit the function argument data > type to Const integer only. So I am thinking about OFFSET for > lag()/lead() may be dynamic integer variable. If it comes, even those > functions don't know how many rows should be cut off. The lag()/lead() > can access any row of partition, per spec. Hmm, yeah, that's a bit of a problem :-(. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: