Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48F4F473.6090707@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Tom Lane napsal(a): >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> I still wonder, though, why we're seeing the error consistently on >>> kudu, and not on any other animal. Perhaps the forknum field that's >>> left uninitialized gets a different value there than on other platforms. >> >> Hmm ... AFAICS this mistake would mean that no forknum field of the >> requests[] array ever gets set at all, so they would stay at whatever >> the virgin value in the shmem segment had been. Perhaps Solaris doesn't >> guarantee that a shared memory block starts out as zeroes? > > For security reason any OS should clean memory pages before process > first touches them. Yeah. But it doesn't necessarily need to fill them with zeros, any garbage will do. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: