Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
От | Kevin Murphy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48F4B3C2.1050805@genome.chop.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Mikkel H�gh wrote: > >> You are targetting DBAs using servers with less than 512 MB RAM. Is >> PostgreSQL supposed to be used by professional DBAs on enterprise >> systems or is it supposed to run out of the box on my old Pentium 3? > > you'll discover that the Linux default for how much memory an > application like PostgreSQL can allocate is 32MB. This is true even if > you install the OS on a system with 128GB of RAM. One thing that might help people swallow the off-putting default "toy mode" performance of PostgreSQL would be an explanation of why PostgreSQL uses its shared memory architecture in the first place. How much of a performance or stability advantage does it confer under what database usage and hardware scenarios? How can any such claims be proven except by writing a bare-bones database server from scratch that can use multiple memory models? -Kevin Murphy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: