Re: The Axe list
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The Axe list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48F22796.9070908@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The Axe list ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: The Axe list
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:57:58 +0300 > "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10/11/08, D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> wrote: >>> + if (!random_initialized) >>> + { >>> + srandom((unsigned int) time(NULL)); >>> + random_initialized = true; >>> + } >> This is bad idea, postgres already does srandom() > > Is that new? I added that to my local version at one time because I > was getting the same salt every time I ran it. You really should not be using the standard random() function to generat salts... You need a more secure one. >>> + if ((result = (char *) palloc(16)) != NULL) >>> + { >>> + result[0] = ':'; >>> + strcpy(result + 1, password->password); >>> + } >> AFAIK palloc() cannot return NULL? > > Really? My program will simply come crashing down if there is a memory > problem without giving me a chance to clean up? It will do an ereport() call and clean things up. This is one of the things that rock with using palloc ;-) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: