Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48EB7E11.4010603@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> I'm just grumpy because I can't see a way to do the >> patch-on-patch-on-patch that I'll need to make this all work for Nov 1. >> So big patch here we come. But that's just the way it is and I'll stop >> honking about it. > > This is one of the problems that DVCSs are supposed to solve ... have > you tried Git? Yeah, I maintained a relforks patch + FSM patch on top of that for quite some time using git. It's still a bit of work, for sure, but it's possible. The bottom line is that hot standby is a big feature, and probably a big patch. No amount of version control will work around that. Finishing all that in a few weeks is a very ambitious goal. I wish you luck, and I wish I could do more to help you with that; it's a feature I'd really like to see in 8.4. Given how many iterations just this part of the patch needed, and it's still not there, the little project manager in me says that we really need to be seeing the complete patch or patches very soon, and do a first round of review well before the commit fest. The risk that we have to drop it as unfinished in November is very high otherwise. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: