Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48EA1BC6.7010705@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Currently, pg_settings.enumvals presents a list of strings formatted in > an ad-hoc manner. Shouldn't we be presenting this as text[], so that > clients don't need special-purpose code to break it apart? > > Another possible argument is that the values ought to be separated by > newlines instead of ", ", which would still be a special-purpose format > but it would probably look better in modern psql versions. At least it > wouldn't be contributing to the problem of the view's output being > ridiculously wide. > > Comments? Agreed, it can certainly be bettered. text[] seems to be the cleanest, but then we still have the issue with wide output in psql, no? But should we really design the view around the single use-case of psql? You can still just omit that column from the SELECT if you want... //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: