Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48E3865E.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net> writes: >> - yes, if you're willing to compute true CRC's as opposed to simpler >> checksums, which may be worth the price if in fact many/most data >> check failures are truly caused by single bit errors somewhere in the >> chain, > > FWIW, not one of the corrupted-data problems I've investigated has ever > looked like a single-bit error. So the theoretical basis for using a > CRC here seems pretty weak. I doubt we'd even consider automatic repair > attempts anyway. +1 The only single-bit errors I've seen have been the result of a buggy driver for a particular model of network card. The problem went away with the next update of the driver. I've never encountered a single-bit error in a disk sector. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: