Re: [REVIEW] Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [REVIEW] Prototype: In-place upgrade v02 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48E1D05E.7020807@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [REVIEW] Prototype: In-place upgrade v02 (Abbas <abbas.butt@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Abbas napsal(a): > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 14:42 +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> >>> Do I have to perform performance tests too? >> Yes, please. My colleague tested it and got 5% performance drop, but it was not >> complete version and I tested full patch on Friday and It was surprise for me >> ... I got little bit better throughput (about 0,5%) with patch. I'm going to >> retest it again but it would be good to get result also from others. > > > Are there defined ways of benchmarking the current performance of pg > database on my system? > Are there any guide lines on what type of data or table design should be > used? I think integer, numeric, text and some composite type should be enough. > One option of getting the benchmarks could be to use the run time > statistics logging with and without the patch. Run time statistic should be same. Patch add extra wrapper around page and heaptuple processing. By my opinion pg_stat* output shouldn't show extra difference. > And I have to test the performance of the 4 basic queries INSERT, > UPDATE, DELETE and SELECT, right? > Yes. It would be nice compare simple SELECT and complex SELECT too. Thanks Zdenek Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: