Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48DD24FE.5050909@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >>> samples % symbol name >>> 55526 16.5614 LWLockAcquire >>> 29721 8.8647 DoCopy >>> 26581 7.9281 CopyReadLine >>> 25105 7.4879 LWLockRelease >>> 15743 4.6956 PinBuffer >>> 14725 4.3919 heap_formtuple > >> Probably loading a table with a generated PK or loading data in >> ascending sequence, so its contending heavily for the rightmost edge of >> the index. > > No, given that DoCopy and CopyReadLine are right up there, I think we're > still looking at the COPY phase, not index building. > > The profile will probably change completely once index building > starts... yeah this profile is only showing the COPY phase ... Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: