Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48DD0A38.7000402@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > >> samples % symbol name >> 1933314 21.8884 LWLockAcquire >> 1677808 18.9957 XLogInsert >> 848227 9.6034 LWLockRelease >> 414179 4.6892 DoCopy >> 332633 3.7660 CopyReadLine >> 266580 3.0181 UnpinBuffer >> 221693 2.5099 heap_formtuple >> > > I suppose Andrew didn't yet put in the hack to avoid WAL logging > during the COPY commands. The LWLockAcquires are presumably > blocking on WALInsertLock, given that XLogInsert is also right > up there ... > > > Yes I did. That's what the --truncate-before-load switch does (or should do). cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: