Re: Bad link for win32/latest

Harald Armin Massa wrote:
> my vote:
> 
>>>> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we
>>>>  say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing
>>>> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
>>>> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
>>>> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have
>>>> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not
>>>> very consistent :-(
> 
> I recommend to keep all versions including binaries available. Space is cheap.

We already have "ftp-archive" which keeps the old stuffthat not so many
people want. It's not a matter of removing it, it's a matter of staging
it off to the other area.

//Magnus