Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48DA7666.80404@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Drake wrote: > I know of no one that really uses SELinux because it is a nightmare. On > the other hand, this type of security is required to get into certain > scary tin foil hat producing institutions. Yeah, but do we even have the slightest bit of information about what exactly would be required to achieve the required levels? And whether this patch does it? And whether there would be alternative, more desirable ways to achieve a similar level? I am not arguing for or against this patch now, but I would like to know whether someone has an agenda for it. Without an agenda, future maintenance will be difficult. Reference to standards or other public documents would work best to define that agenda.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: