Re: parallel pg_restore
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: parallel pg_restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48D7EC8F.1000106@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: parallel pg_restore (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: parallel pg_restore
Re: parallel pg_restore |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: >> I will not argue vehemently here but I will say that "jobs" doesn't >> seem correct. The term "workers" seems more appropriate. >> > > Agreed, but most utilities have "j" free but not w, p, t or other > letters that might be synonyms. > > j is at least used for exactly this purpose in other tools. > > There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite. j and m happen to be two of those that are available. I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: