More shared_buffers instead of effective_cache_size?
От | Ulrich |
---|---|
Тема | More shared_buffers instead of effective_cache_size? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48C035E2.3070407@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: More shared_buffers instead of effective_cache_size?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I have a virtual server with 256 MB of RAM. I am using it as a webserver, mailserver and for postgres. So there is something like 150MB left for postgres. Here are my configs (I haven't benchmarked...) max_connections = 12 (I think, I will not have more parallel connections, because I only have 10 PHP worker threads) shared_buffers = 24MB work_mem = 1MB maintenance_work_mem = 16MB (effective_cache_size = 80MB) Normally, the file-cache is part of the free ram. But on my virtual server, it looks like if there is one big file cache for the whole hardware node and I do not have my own reserved cached, so it is not easy to find a good value for effective_cache_size. I've also benchmarked the file-cache using dd (100MB file) 1. Read from HDD: 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 8.38522 seconds, 12.5 MB/s 2. Read from Cache: 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 3.48694 seconds, 30.1 MB/s That is really really slow (10 times slower than on my other machine). What would you do now? Increasing shared_buffers to 100MB and setting effective_cache_size to 0MB? Or increasing effective_cache_size, too? Thanks for help. Regards, -Ulrich
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: