Re: Partitions number limitation ?
От | Thomas Finneid |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitions number limitation ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48C00687.1010200@ifi.uio.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Partitions number limitation ? (s.caillet@free.fr) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
s.caillet@free.fr wrote: > Is there some kind of limit in postgresql about the number of partitions ? Do > you know some tuning in the conf files to improve postgresql management of so > many tables ? I have already used different tablespaces, one for each main table > and its 288 partitions. Postgres is not really designed for performance of partitions, so you have to manage that yourself. I am working on a project with a similar design and found that the super table has its limitations. At some point the db just aborts a query if there are to many partitions. I seem to remeber I have worked with up to 100K partitions, but managed them individually instead of through the super table. Just a tip: if the table gets data inserted once and then mainly read after that, its faster to create the index for the partition after the insert. Another tip: use COPY to insert data instead of INSERT, its about 3-5 times faster, it is supported by the C driver and a patched JDBC driver regards tom
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: