Re: Large number of tables slow insert
От | dforum |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large number of tables slow insert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48B170B2.9000401@vieonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large number of tables slow insert ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
hello to all, I've a question regarding the folowing comments. How to estimate vacuum aggressiveness ? It's for me very deficulte to setup the autovaccum setting correctly. It seems for me that it is not enough aggressive, but when I change the settings the autovacuum process is almost always running. So how to setup it, for around 40000 insert, update, delete per 5 minutes regards david Scott Marlowe a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr> wrote: > >> 1 table contains about 5 indexes : timestamp, one for each sensor type - 3, >> and one for packet counting (measures packet dropping) >> (I reckon that this is quite heavy, but a least the timestamp and the values >> are really usefull) >> > > But what's the update rate on these indexes and tables? I'm wondering > if you're not vacuuming aggresively enough to keep up with bursty > update patterns > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: