Re: request for sponsors page
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: request for sponsors page |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48AEDEDE.9060506@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: request for sponsors page (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: request for sponsors page
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >>> No, I'm not because if you think we should start tracking and listing >>> everyone that gives us five bucks then you clearly need to come in out >>> of the sun for a while :-). >> Why not? It's the best way to increase the number of people who give us >> $5. > > Well, someone giving three qualified answers to a mailing list inquiry on a > user list is worth a lot more than five bucks of their time, and you surely > don't want to include that in your listing. > If we use money as the qualifier for sponsorships listing anything less than 5 - 10k is silly. We already provide thank you, hand shake, and general acknowledgment. Here is the thing, most of the people that contribute are already getting their return from: A. The software B. The kick butt community we have C. What they sponsored Generally speaking people don't sponsor PostgreSQL.Org. They sponsor WEST, PGDay, PGEU etc... They are already getting their monies worth. They don't even need to be on PostgreSQL.Org and frankly if they are going to be on PostgreSQL.Org we need to greatly increase the cost of our sponsorships. Now moving "out" of the money side of things we have the real contributions, code and man power. CMD EDB Sun etc... Those entities should be on the web site. The only question is, where and in what order. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: