Re: Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug? - SOLVED
От | Dave Witt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug? - SOLVED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48AEDB7C.3060203@movenetworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ah.. my definition of MDT was flawed; thanks for the help!<br /><br /> Alvaro Herrera wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:20080822011725.GX4169@alvh.no-ip.org"type="cite"><pre wrap="">Tom Lane wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><prewrap="">Dave Witt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dwitt@movenetworks.com"><dwitt@movenetworks.com></a>writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Thesetwo queries produce different output, using version 8.3.3: SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'MDT'; SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'America/Boise'; </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">Why are yousurprised? Boise would've been on MST not MDT on that date. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> i.e. try using MST7MDT instead, which behaves more sanely. -- Alvaro Herrera <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.CommandPrompt.com/">http://www.CommandPrompt.com/</a> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. </pre></blockquote><br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: