Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?
От | Robert Gravsjö |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48ABD34A.5090509@blogg.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database? (Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Mark Roberts wrote: > 1. 2.5-3TB, several others that are of fractional sisize. > > > ... > > > 5. They do pretty well, actually. Our aggregate fact tables regularly > join to metadata tables and we have an average query return time of > 10-30s. We do make some usage of denormalized mviews for > chained/hierarchical metadata tables. > > Just out of curiosity, how do you replicate that amount of data? > ... > > A few notes: our database really can be broken into a very typical ETL > database: medium/high input (write) volume with low latency access > required. I can provide a developer's view of what is necessary to keep > a database of this size running, but I'm under no illusion that it's > actually a "large" database. > > I'd go into more details, but I'd hate to be rambling. If anyone's > actually interested about any specific parts, feel free to ask. :) > I'd be very interested in a developers view of running and maintaining a database this size. Mostly what choices is made during development that might have been different on a smaller database. I'm also curious about the maintenance needed to keep a database this size healthy over time. Regards, /roppert > Also, if you feel that we're doing "something wrong", feel free to > comment there too. :) > > -Mark > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: