Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model
От | Roderick A. Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48A59654.5030304@acm.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:20:14PM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: >> Anyone aware of an ER model for holding name server records? > > What about a datatype? I have reason to believe that a company I used > to work for implemented such a thing. There was some talk of > releasing it, but I think there was some combination of insufficient > demand, worries about competitive advantage, and concern about long > term support. Thanks A. I did a quick look and a custom TYPE may be useful. > > Because of my involvement in that project, I can't make direct > recommendations about this topic. But supposing one was to go to > various DNS-related lists, it seems to me it wouldn't be that hard to > get information about the wire datatypes such that you'd have enough > information to implement them in Postgres (assuming you know something > about Postgres datatypes). More research is on the schedule this week-end. > One hint: remember the "unknown" RRTYPE. If you have questions about > RRTYPEs, I'm happy to answer. Thanks again. This is a pretty specialized application (at this time) so the RRTYPEs used are limited. I am trying to make the model and Pg implementation as generic as possible in case it gets released into the wild later. Thanks for the offer on the RRTYPEs. Zone files /can/ get pretty hairy plus the company I'm doing this for gets some strange requests from their customers -- not always correct or logical. :-( Rod --
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: