Re: So what about XSLT?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: So what about XSLT? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48A59125.1010806@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: So what about XSLT? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: So what about XSLT?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > >> An open task in replacing contrib/xml2 is the XSLT support, which the current >> core implementation lacks altogether. I am known to often be in favor of a >> lean core, so I have so far been hesitant to push this further, but we should >> eventually come up with an implementation for the users' sake. >> > > >> So where should XSLT functionality live: >> > > That question is unanswerable except in the context of a specific > proposal for the amount of functionality and code involved. To take > it to extremes: if you are talking about adding 100 lines, no one will > object to putting it in core; if you are talking about adding 100000 > lines, some of us will object. I suppose you are thinking of something > in between, but what? > > well, contrib/xml2/xslt_proc.c has 172 lines. So I suggest we just import that to core and drop the rest of the module as redundant. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: