Re: BUG #17635: The behavior of quote_ident differs from what the doc specifies
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17635: The behavior of quote_ident differs from what the doc specifies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 489744.1665517893@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #17635: The behavior of quote_ident differs from what the doc specifies (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > The quote_ident doc here: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-OTHER > says this: > « > Return the given string suitably quoted to be used as an identifier in an > SQL statement string. Quotes are added only if necessary... > » > But tests show that the returned text is often double-quoted when this is > NOT necessary. As I said on the other thread, I think it's good from a future-proofing standpoint that quote_ident is more conservative than strictly necessary. One of the primary use-cases for it is preparing dumps that might get loaded into future PG versions, or other RDBMSes altogether, that could have different ideas of which characters are allowed in unquoted identifiers. (Most obviously, we might stop lumping all non-ASCII characters together.) So I don't want to change the code. Perhaps we should remove "only" from the quoted docs fragment, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: