Re: unnecessary code in_bt_split
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unnecessary code in_bt_split |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4896CA77.7070909@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unnecessary code in_bt_split (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: unnecessary code in_bt_split
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> I found that _bt_split function calls PageGetTempPage, but next call is >> _bt_page_init which clear all contents anyway. Is there any reason to call >> PageGetTempPage instead of palloc? > > Not violating a perfectly good abstraction? OK. Abstraction is nice, but what I see in the PageGetTempPage It is more like code which makes everything but usability is zero. It is used only in two places and in both it is used for different purpose. _bt_split() needs only allocate empty temp page and gistplacetopage() . By my opinion It would be better to have three functions: PageCreateTempPage - only allocate memory and call pageinit PageCloneSpecial - copy special section from source page PageRestoreTempPage - no change. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: