How other package pgjdbc
От | Pavel Raiskup |
---|---|
Тема | How other package pgjdbc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4891530.ozDQ5MGqEi@nb.usersys.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How other package pgjdbc
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Monday 25 of January 2016 15:33:18 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday 25 of January 2016 08:46:56 Dave Cramer wrote: > > Well like it or not, spring is arguably the largest enterprise java > > dependency and it has hundreds if not thousands of dependencies which > > enterprise users happily download. > > I can concur with you, Dave. There are people who are OK with that. > > > So I'm not sure how your argument holds water. > > Sure. You may choose to force users to use maven everywhere, via not > allowing us to build from source. But I'm here please you not to do that. > > > I would imagine from a redhat perspective redhat is the only trusted > > source. However this is 2016 and the sheer volume of dependencies > > modern software requires makes this presumption untenable. > > Substitute Red Hat with any Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris etc. distributions. > All of those are used and trusted. At least nowadays -- making this > totally off-topic is not worth; I'm just trying to build from source. > > Believe it or not -- there are people who do not trust maven repositories > -- and I'm not sure whether PostgreSQL project should encourage people to > use maven repositories everywhere. PostgreSQL should be re-distribuable > everywhere, if possible. > > > This argument is not constructive but an attempt to show another point > > of view. > > Ack. > > > I have asked to join the osgi-dev list and will ask them how to deal > > with this issue > > Right, but our mission is to distribute pgjdbc, not OSGi (which is > something osgi-dev will tell you probably). If we could opt-out it, it > would be fine. Just a quick observation while trying to convince you that GNU/Linux distributions do care about pgjdbc package-ability: Gentoo build scripts: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/dev-java/jdbc-postgresql/jdbc-postgresql-9.4_p1206.ebuild Which is something I'm trying to avoid, but yes -- they were able to rebase to 1206 thanks to those hacks. Arch linux has pgjdbc in AUR repository. It means that there is no support -- the reason is because they do not build from source; they download the binary from upstream repository. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql-jdbc/ Debian has already been discussed. Way too old packages. OpenSUSE (9.4.1201): https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Leap:42.1/postgresql-jdbc/postgresql-jdbc.spec?expand=1 Pavel
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: