Re: php + postgresql
| От | Tino Wildenhain |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: php + postgresql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4889F3F5.5020208@wildenhain.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: php + postgresql (admin <mick@mjhall.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: php + postgresql
Re: php + postgresql |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, admin wrote: >> Is there any special reason to use PHP? There are >> a couple other scripting languages useable for the >> web which do all have better abstration available. >> (afaic even PHP does have some more abstration to >> just using pg* functions) > > Well, yes, there are alternatives of course and I could write this stuff > in perl or python but it'd take me 10 times as long because my > experience is elsewhere. Learning new stuff is always good, but at the > end of the day I get paid for making stuff work on time and in budget > ... mostly :-) > > I think that PHP (like PostgreSQL, perhaps?) suffers from a reputation > hangover from years ago. PostgreSQL was supposedly "slow", PHP is > supposedly "undisciplined" and "unprofessional". You sure can still Well no PHP is conceptual undisciplined and confusing. I would not compare this with Postgresql itself which is very professional developed with a great vision. PHP is just and always was a hack. > write spaghetti with PHP5 if you want to, but you can also write decent > code with planning and standards. But good, bad or ugly, it's what I > personally am most productive in. > > I have used PHP's PEAR DB abstraction class many times. It doen't really > save much time or effort writing code, and has a performance overhead. I > don't need to allow the possibility of switching to another database and > stuff like that. Sure, you must consider it yourself but having a little abstraction helps even as kind of inherent documentation when you later need to touch your code again. Regards Tino
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: