Re: pg_query transaction: auto rollback? begin or start?? commit or end???
От | Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_query transaction: auto rollback? begin or start?? commit or end??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4887F43E.7010104@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_query transaction: auto rollback? begin or start?? commit or end??? ("Bill Wordsworth" <bill.wordsworth@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_query transaction: auto rollback? begin or
start?? commit or end???
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Wordsworth wrote: > Thanks Chris and Karsten. I still don't quite understand why invalid > state/record-mismatch would also not trigger auto rollback. If you should have put id 5 instead of id 2 as a foreign key, how is the database going to know the difference? Both are valid id's and valid data for an "int" type field. How can I > even include something *outside* a transaction *inside* it- shouldn't > everything between "begin" and "end" be subject to auto rollback no > matter what? Most things in postgres are transaction safe, some aren't like "cluster" or "vacuum full". I couldn't find a list of things that won't work in a transaction but it's a pretty short list. Even table changes (alter table, create index etc) are transaction safe. Maybe I misunderstand the question. > Also what is the best way to check if transaction is 'read write' > after doing 'pg_query("begin transaction read write;", $connection);'. > pg_transaction_status() doesn't quite do it (read write=?=2). That's going to report if you're inside a transaction or not, it's not going to report what transaction level you are in. I don't think there's a way to show that. -- Postgresql & php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: