Polymorphic types vs. domains
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Polymorphic types vs. domains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4887.1228700773@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains
Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The proximate cause of this complaint: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-12/msg00283.php seems to be that the polymorphic-type code doesn't consider a domain over an enum type to match an ANYENUM function argument. ISTM this is probably wrong: we need such a domain to act like its base type for matching purposes. There is an analogous problem with a domain over an array type failing to match ANYARRAY; conversely, such a domain is considered to match ANYNONARRAY which it likely should not. Comments? If this is agreed to be a bug, should we consider back-patching it? (I'd vote not, I think, because the behavioral change could conceivably break some apps that work now.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: