Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches

Hi,

sorry, some strange key-combination made my mail client send too early...

I myself wrote:
> I was trying to say that Postgres-R internally relies only on a unique 
> index with not null constraint. It doesn't care if you name it PRIMARY 
> KEY or REPLICATION KEY or whatever.
> 
> So, it's just a question of the syntax. We already have PRIMARY KEYs, 
> and those are pretty much what I think is needed in 99% of all cases as 
> the pointer to the replication

.. as the pointer to the index to use for replication.

Offering the user a possibility to choose another (index + not null) 
would require something like ALTER TABLE ... ADD REPLICATION KEY ... or 
some such. Mostly syntactic sugar, which can be added as soon as we 
really need it.

> While I'm normally an absolute fan of generality,
> 
> I think you didn't quite get the point.

Iiik.. that's what I didn't want to send and wanted to delete before 
sending... :-)  Sorry.

Regards

Markus