Naming of new tsvector functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Naming of new tsvector functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4875.1462210058@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Naming of new tsvector functions
Re: Naming of new tsvector functions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed that 6943a946c introduces some new functions named delete() and filter(). This does not seem like a terribly bright idea to me. They may not be formally ambiguous with the corresponding keywords, but it's not very hard to imagine how small typos could lead to the parser taking the unintended interpretation and then producing totally confusing error messages. It's even less hard to imagine this choice preventing us from introducing some new syntax in future (for instance, DELETE ... RETURNING ... as a subquery-in-FROM) because it *would* be formally ambiguous. I think we'd be better off to rename these to tsvector_delete() and tsvector_filter() while we still can. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: