Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48731347.8050802@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout napsal(a): > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:06:08PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: >> I guess that'd be the reason to keep it on pgFoundry, but I have two >> comments: >> >> * 2-3 years is a *long* time in Internet time. > > There have been patches over the years, but they tend not to get looked > at. Recently someone pulled up the COLLATE patch from a couple of years > ago but it didn't get much feedback either. (I can't find the link > right now). I know about it. I have printed your proposal on my desk. I think It is linked from TODO list. > It's disappointing that the discussions get hung up on the ICU library > when it's not required or even needed for COLLATE support. My original > patch never even mentioned it. > > I note that Firebird added COLLATE using ICU a few years back now. I > think PostgreSQL is the only large DBMS to not support it. Complete agree. Collation missing support is big problem for many users. >> * There is on guarantee that it will be finished in that time or, >> indeed ever (no disrespect to Radek Strnad, it's just there are always >> unforeseen issues). > > I think that with concerted coding effort it could be done in 2-3 > months (judging by how long it took to write the first version). The > problem is it needs some planner kung-fu which not many people have. I agree that 2-3 months on fulltime is good estimation, problem is that you need kung-fu master which has time to do it :(. What we currently have is student which works on it in free time. Zdenek -- Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: