Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48726722.9000301@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a): > > > Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> >> >> 2) contrib vs. pgFoundry >> >> There is unresolved answer if we want to have this in contrib or not. >> Good to mention that citext type will be obsoleted with full collation >> implementation in a future. I personally prefer to keep it on >> pgFoundry because it is temporally workaround (by my opinion), but I >> can live with contrib module as well. >> >> >> > > Is there a concrete plan to get to full collation support (i.e. per > column) in any known time frame? If not, then I think a citext module > would be acceptable. Collation per database should be part of 8.4. Radek Strnad works on it as a SoC project. He plans to continue on this work and implement full support as his Master of Thesis in 2-3 years time frame. Zdenek -- Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: