Re: Postgres benchmark?
От | David Siebert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres benchmark? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 486B96F7.6040805@eclipsecat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres benchmark? (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres benchmark?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Well that is the rub. I am currently using Postgres everyday. It runs like a champ and even on an old PIII 600 MHZ machine with a single old and slow IDE drive and 256 megs of ram it is fast enough for what we do. This is more for me to do some testing with. I think it would useful as a tunning tool if nothing else. What I would like to try just for my own amusment is to build a small test box. It will not be a server class machine. I am thinking of using an AMD X2 and to start a SATA hard drive. Then I would like to test different file systems, then different operating systems, different amounts of ram, 32 vs 64 bit, and software raids. I would use the same machine for all the tests so it would have a good base line. I doubt that would ever publish my results. The flame war that would happen would take all the fun out of it for me. I am sure that someone would say that since I wasn't using a server machine that my results where invalid, others would say that I made errors in tuning for the different operating systems or that X would show benefits if I was using a real server machine. And all of them may be right. But sometimes you just want to play. > > Do you want to use PostgreSQL for any particular task? If so, the best > benchmark is probably one that simulates your specific workload. > Comparing generic benchmark results like pgbench etc may not usefully > reflect performance in real-world use with your load and your data. > > -- > Craig Ringer > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: