Re: the un-vacuumable table
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: the un-vacuumable table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 486216AC.6040204@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | the un-vacuumable table ("Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: the un-vacuumable table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Hammond wrote: > I found this error message in my log files repeatedly: > > Error: failed to re-find parent key in "ledgerdetail_2008_03_idx2" for > deletion target page 64767 > > I though "hmm, that index looks broken. I'd better re-create it." So, I > dropped the index and then tried to create a new one to replace it. Which > completely locked up the backend that was running the CREATE TABLE. I ran > truss against the backend in question and it didn't register anything > (except signals 2 and 15 when I tried to cancel the query and kill the > backend respectively). I eventually had to restart the database to get the > CREATE INDEX process to go away (well, to release that big nasty lock). What kind of an index is it? Does "SELECT COUNT(*) from <table>" work? > Anyway, the current plan is to drop the table and reload it from backup. I'm > posting here in case there's interest in gathering some forensic data or a > clever suggetion about how I can recover this situation or even some ideas > about what's causing it. Yes, please take a filesystem-level backup right away to retain the evidence. Could you connect to the hung backend with gdb and get a stacktrace? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: